The death penalty can provide families of victims with some closure, which may help them to deal with their suffering. In turn, the best way to … Arbitrariness. The death penalty is reserved for the most heinous of crimes, such as murder.
To continue to house, clothe and feed them for the remainder of their natural life at taxpayer expense makes a mockery of justice.
May 18, 2020. The death penalty is applied arbitrarily and inconsistently.
Wrongly convicted, innocent people have received death penalty sentences, and tragically, were killed by the state.
It is a cost-effective solution. Most death penalty cases involve the execution of murderers although capital punishment can also be applied for treason, espionage, and other crimes. It deters prisoners who are already serving life sentences in jail from committing more serious offenses. Without the death penalty, some criminals would continue to commit crimes. The best way to deal with crime obviously is to stop it from happening in the first place.
Fifty-five percent of Americans support the death penalty, according to a 2017 Gallup poll.A survey the polling organization took two years later found that 56% of Americans support capital punishment for convicted murderers, down 4% from a similar poll taken in 2016. Proponents of the death penalty say it is an important tool for preserving law and order, deters crime, and costs less than life imprisonment. Why should a murderer be allowed to live out the rest of their lives in relative comfort, paid for by the public? The death penalty is used disproportionately against the poor, who cannot afford expensive legal counsel, as well as against racial, ethnic, and religious minorities.
One of the best arguments for the death penalty is that capital punishment is a huge deterrent we have to prevent others from committing heinous crimes. Florida Supreme Court Changes Law Again to Further Diminish Legal Protections in Death Penalty Cases.